Thursday, August 18, 2011

Thinking through the opening quotations . . .


What is [the] end game? It is captured in the words of Terence, or in his Latin name, Publius Terentius Afer. He was a black man, born in Carthage of African descent, about 200 years B.C., brought to Rome as a slave by a master who, struck by his intelligence, gave him access to a first-rate education and later freed him. Terence went on to become the most popular playwright of Rome in his day. At one point, he wrote: "I am human. Nothing human can be alien to me."

This is the universal truth. We may never know what a tiger feels slipping through the jungle or a dolphin as it swims the ocean, but whatever another human has felt, we can feel it too. Ultimately, it matters little that I am an aging Chinese-Uruguayan in West Newton: Shakespeare's lines written in Elizabethan England, Thucydides' chronicles of Greek wars two thousand years ago, Li Po's poems from the T'ang Dynasty, Isabel Allende mourning the loss of her daughter, Ralph Ellison's invisibility in mid-twentieth century United States, all speak to me as surely as Maya Angelou's words at the begin-ning of the twenty-first. This is because we are all members of the same species. We are humans.
                                                                                 --Michael Chu

38 comments:

  1. is he just saying he can understand anything another human is experiences no matter how different they are from him?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I get it. Couldn't you compare Gene to Publius Terentius and his slave master to Phineas? His slave master releasing him is like when Phineas tries to incorporate Gene into the norm at Devon during the Summer Session. Publuis Terentius also shows higher signs of intelligence, like Gene.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I see where the author is coming from, however, one quote i just cannot agree with. "I am human. Nothing human can be alien to me." Many things can be alien to someone, such as terrorists' motives when killing multitudes of innocent people. This connection cannot be felt unless someone else has been in that position. If one person experiences a horrible tragedy, unless you have felt sadness of that level. You cannot relate, making it alien to you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is interesting. The author is right, but also I agree with Charlie that no one can understand a terrorist's mind.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I understand as well, and I agree with Sam and Charlie.

    -Cory

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Charlie in that many things can be alien to humans. We can know the facts and think we understand, but we can never fully comprehend starvation or the mind of a terrorist without living it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I feel like in class we've been talking a lot about point of view and in a way trying to understand Gene and Finny, and what makes them do what they do, as well as what John Knowles was thinking when he wrote this book. I found an article (http://www.exeter.edu/libraries/553_4390.aspx) and I thought that it was particularly interesting that though A Separate Peace is written from Gene's point of view, that Knowles seems to have carried some of Finny's traits as well. This understanding of other humans that Chu speaks about is true, but in order to write a novel, like Knowles did, there would have to be a level of shared experience, would there not? As the reader we can sympathize, but never have the same comprehension as the author himself.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I understand and I also agree with Sam and Charlie

    ReplyDelete
  9. I do not agree with the author. I believe that one may be capable of being empathetic of what another person has gone through. One may even be able to understand what another has gone through. However, our individuality as humans restricts us from being able to "feel" what any other human has felt.

    ReplyDelete
  10. i understand it. he is capable of the same things as all other humans so nothing is alien to him if it is human.

    ReplyDelete
  11. i dont agree with anything that this man says. time has changed the way we live and act. living in thucydides time would be like living on another planet to me. i cannot put myself in the shoe's of someone who lived 500 years ago and understand them just because i am human

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree with charlie about not understanding things that we can not relate to but i also agree with the article in saying that most things human
    can be understood by humans because of our imagination.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think that us as humans can relate to what other humans feel, but I don't think it can be truly understood unless one has experienced something similar.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I believe we can empathize enough with others that we partially understand how it feels to them. Nonetheless, with people in a culture or society so vastly different from ours, we may not be able to comprehend, because our experiences have never related closely enough to it. The closest we can get is to relate what is happening to them to what we have done.

    ReplyDelete
  15. a thought can take place thought words. that is ridiculously obvious. your thoughts are in your mind. if i thought with words, i would never stop talking. i couldnt talk to someone because i would be thinking while i talk. you can share your thoughts without words. art for instance. or essays or actions. to answer the last question, no.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "I am human. Nothing human can be alien to me." I disagree with this statement.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with what Osei said. "Individuality as humans restricts us from being able to 'feel' what any other human has felt."

    ReplyDelete
  18. I agree with William. I thought takes place within the mind, not through speech and language. Speech and language is the act of expressing your thoughts

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think sam is wrong for not being able understanding a terrorists mind. It takes understanding other people on another level to really "walk in their shoes." It isn't very hard at all to make the stretch that a person, especially a young man, influenced by radical figures, who are driven by their religious beliefs, can see these horrific acts as defending their beliefs, and admirable. Their world contrasts dramatically from ours and seeing their world from our standpoint isn't effective in understanding. We are all human, and our unity can only be destroyed religion and ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I totally get it. I feel like we as a group are really understanding what is going on in the class. Also our discussions are on point instead of going off track.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I get it again. Nothing is hard because our discussions have a lot of details and notes to take.

    ReplyDelete
  22. In answer to what Kandace said, the quote is saying that he is human and he can understand anything that other humans can feel. To a point I agree with you. I think that some people will never know experiences that other people will. As an example, none of us will ever experience the hunger of people in famine ravished countries. However, people can still relate to experiences and try to put themselves in that situation. I think the quote is focusing on that ability to empathize.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I agree with Kyle on this. Though you might not be able to feel it directly, you cringe when you see someone get badly hurt. Even though you can't feel it yourself you can imagine what they are going through

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  26. This is random, but here is a link relating Beowulf to the Lord of the Rings. http://deniseod.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/the-influence-of-beowulf-on-j-r-r-tolkiens-the-lord-of-the-rings/
    Interesting...

    ReplyDelete
  27. I don't think than anything human is familiar. There are plenty of things that humans do that I can even imagine.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Doctor,
    With Othello starting, in our weekly notes D period has constantly asked what do we do for our textual paragraphs? I understand independent work and the journal entry, but what about the textual paragraph?

    ReplyDelete